Beatbot Pool Cleaners

We have not run any of these

Nothing here has been tested in a pool. What follows is Beatbot's published specification for each model, read off the live listings on 2026-09-20 and compared like for like against the four numbers this site uses for every robot.

The brand publishes what the category hides

Most robot listings give you modes, app screenshots and a cleaning-time claim. Coverage area, suction and battery capacity are usually missing, which makes sizing a robot to a pool guesswork.

Beatbot's Sora listings state all of it: 6,800 GPH of suction from what it calls a HydroBalance structure, battery capacity in mAh, runtime in minutes or hours, and coverage in square feet per charge. Whether those figures are measured the way you would measure them is unknowable from here - but a number you can compare beats a number nobody prints.

The range, by published figures

Read down the table and the range splits cleanly in two. The Sora models publish everything; the AquaSense models publish features instead of figures. That is an odd way to build a lineup, because the AquaSense machines are the expensive ones.

Sizing a Sora against your pool

Coverage per charge is the number that decides whether a battery robot finishes the job, and 3,229 sq ft is generous against most residential pools.

On runtime the Sora 10 states up to 300 minutes from a 7,310 mAh battery, and the 30 and 70 state up to 5 hours from 10,000 mAh. Those are floor-cleaning figures; a cycle that includes walls and waterline draws harder.

What the shallow-water figures mean

Three listings state a minimum depth: 12 inches for the Sora 10, 8 inches for the Sora 30 and 70. That number matters more than it sounds, because tanning ledges, sun shelves and the top step are where battery robots strand themselves.

A robot that grounds on a ledge churns its propellers, drains its battery and sits there until someone lifts it out. If your pool has a shelf shallower than a foot, the 8 inch models are the ones that address it - and both state ultrasonic sensing to find those areas deliberately rather than stumble onto them.

Surface parking is the feature that matters daily

Every model in the range states that it returns to the surface at the end of a cycle or when the battery drops below 12%, and parks at the pool edge. The Sora 70 goes further and states it drains its internal water before you lift it.

This is not a gimmick. A battery robot that dies on the floor of the deep end has to be fished out with a pole, and a machine full of water weighs far more coming out than going in. It is the single most practical difference between this range and a cheap cordless unit.

What Beatbot does not publish

One number is missing across the entire range: filtration micron rating. Every listing describes what the robot picks up and none states how fine the filter is.

That is the specification that decides whether a pool comes out leaf-free or actually clear. Aiper publishes 3 micron on the Scuba V3 and Wybot publishes 10 micron behind 180 on the C2; against those, Beatbot's silence is a real gap - see best robotic pool cleaners for how the brands compare on that number.

The iSkim is the exception: it states a 550 micron basket mesh, which is appropriate for a surface skimmer catching leaves rather than silt.

The picks

Top pick - Surface debris and floor in one machine

Beatbot Sora 70 AI Navigation Pool Vacuum Robot

The one that publishes everything: suction, battery, runtime and coverage. On this site's criteria that makes it the Beatbot to compare against a Dolphin or an Aiper.

The published figure

Listing states 6,800 GPH suction, a 10,000 mAh battery, up to 5 hours of floor cleaning, up to 3,200 sq ft per charge and JetPulse surface cleaning

Beatbot states 6,800 GPH of suction from its HydroBalance structure, a 10,000 mAh battery, up to 5 hours of floor cleaning and up to 3,200 sq ft per charge. That is the full set of numbers this site asks for and rarely gets.

It states a JetPulse system of dual water jets that steer floating debris into the suction inlet - surface skimming built into a floor robot, which is normally a second machine.

Coverage extends to shallow areas as low as 8 inches, per the listing, and it parks itself at the surface and drains internal water before you lift it.

What it does well

• Publishes suction, battery, runtime and coverage together
• Cleans the surface as well as floor, walls and waterline
• Self-surfaces and drains before retrieval

What it costs you

• Premium price against corded robots that clean as well underwater
• Battery machines eventually need a battery, which is not a user part
• No filtration micron rating published

Skip it if you already own a surface skimmer. The JetPulse system is much of what you are paying for here.

$1,199.00 - View on Amazon

$1,499.00 · 20% off

#ad · how this is funded · price as of October 10, 2026

Pick 2 - Tanning ledges and sun shelves

Beatbot Sora 30 Pool Vacuum Robot

The same suction, battery and coverage as the Sora 70 without the surface jets. For most pools that is the sensible saving.

The published figure

Listing states 6,800 GPH suction, a 10,000 mAh battery, up to 5 hours of cleaning, 3,229 sq ft per charge and ultrasonic detection of ledges down to 8 inches

Beatbot states 6,800 GPH, a 10,000 mAh battery, up to 5 hours of continuous floor cleaning and up to 3,229 sq ft per charge - identical headline figures to the Sora 70.

It states four-zone cleaning across floor, waterline, walls and platform, using ultrasonic sensors to identify ledges, platforms and shallow areas down to 8 inches. Tanning ledges are where most robots either strand themselves or skip the area entirely.

Like the rest of the range it parks at the surface when the cycle ends or the battery drops below 12%.

What it does well

• Same stated suction, battery and coverage as the Sora 70
• Ultrasonic ledge detection down to 8 inches
• Surfaces itself for retrieval

What it costs you

• No surface skimming, unlike the 70
• No micron rating published
• Still priced well above a corded robot with similar underwater coverage

Skip it if floating leaves are your main complaint. That is the Sora 70's jets or a dedicated skimmer.

Check price on Amazon

#ad · how this is funded

Pick 3 - The cheapest way into the range

Beatbot Sora 10 Cordless Pool Vacuum Robot

Same suction, smaller battery, and a shallow-water limit of 12 inches rather than 8. The entry Beatbot, and the one that competes on price with better-known robots.

The published figure

Listing states 6,800 GPH suction, a 7,310 mAh battery, up to 300 minutes of cleaning, 3,229 sq ft per charge and shallow cleaning to 12 inches

Beatbot states 6,800 GPH suction, a 7,310 mAh battery, up to 300 minutes of continuous cleaning and coverage up to 3,229 sq ft in one session.

It states cleaning of floors, walls and waterline including shallow areas as low as 12 inches - four inches shallower coverage than the Sora 30 claims, which matters only if you have a ledge.

The listing states it suits both inground and above-ground pools and is engineered to be lighter to lift, which is the complaint most owners have about battery robots.

What it does well

• Same 6,800 GPH suction as the pricier models
• 300 minutes of stated runtime
• Stated for above-ground as well as inground pools

What it costs you

• Smaller battery than the Sora 30 and 70
• Shallow coverage stops at 12 inches, not 8
• No micron rating published

Skip it if your pool has a sun shelf shallower than 12 inches. The Sora 30 states 8.

$469.00 - View on Amazon

$699.00 · 33% off

#ad · how this is funded · price as of October 10, 2026

Pick 4 - Complex pools, if the budget is open

Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra Cordless Robotic Pool Cleaner

The most capable machine Beatbot lists and the most expensive robot on this site. Everything it claims is a genuine feature; whether any pool needs all of it is the question.

The published figure

Listing states AI camera mapping, 5-in-1 floor, wall, waterline and surface cleaning, ClearWater clarifier release and surface parking at 12% battery

Beatbot states AI mapping with obstacle detection for complex layouts, and AI platform cleaning that detects plant debris such as leaves, berries and nuts during floor cleaning.

The 5-in-1 claim covers floor, walls, waterline and surface, plus a ClearWater system that releases a clarifier to bind fine particles. That last one is unusual: a robot dosing the water rather than only filtering it.

It states smart surface parking - the robot returns to the surface when the cycle ends or the battery drops below 12%, so you are not fishing it off the floor.

What it does well

• AI mapping and obstacle detection, stated for complex pools
• Cleans surface as well as floor, walls and waterline
• Surfaces itself at the end of a cycle

What it costs you

• Costs several times a capable corded robot
• The clarifier release is a consumable to keep buying
• No published coverage area in square feet on this listing

Skip it if your pool is a simple rectangle. The mapping is what you are paying for, and a rectangle does not need it.

$2,299.00 - View on Amazon

#ad · how this is funded · price as of October 10, 2026

Pick 5 - The AquaSense name at the lowest price

Beatbot AquaSense 2 Cordless Pool Vacuum Robot

The thinnest listing in the range. It states the retrieval feature and very little else, which is a poor basis for a purchase at this price.

The published figure

Listing states automatic surface parking after a cycle or at low battery, with one-click app parking; few other figures published

Beatbot states the AquaSense 2 parks itself above the water after cleaning or when the battery is low, and can be parked on command from the app.

Beyond that, this listing publishes almost nothing - no suction figure, no runtime, no coverage area, where the Sora listings publish all three.

We are not going to import the Sora numbers onto it. If the specification matters to you, buy the model that prints it.

What it does well

• Automatic surface parking and app retrieval
• Sold and shipped by Amazon, unlike most of the range
• Cheapest AquaSense listed

What it costs you

• No suction, runtime or coverage figure published
• Priced like a machine with published specs
• Nothing on the listing separates it from the Sora models

Skip it if you buy on published numbers. The Sora 10 states its suction, battery, runtime and coverage.

$848.99 - View on Amazon

$1,298.00 · 35% off

#ad · how this is funded · price as of October 10, 2026

Pick 6 - Heavy leaf drops

Beatbot iSkim Robotic Pool Surface Skimmer

The only skimmer here that publishes its basket volume, and it is the largest figure on the page - which is the number that decides whether it survives October.

The published figure

9 L basket behind a 29 x 270 mm inlet; 24 W solar panel on a 10,000 mAh battery, stated 28 hours of runtime in no light

Beatbot states a 9 L basket behind a 29 by 270 mm inlet. Every other unit here says 'large basket' and gives no number, and on a pool under trees the basket is what fills and what you walk out to empty.

A wide inlet matters as much as the volume. A whole oak leaf is a couple of inches across, and a narrow slot pushes it aside instead of taking it. 270 mm is a shade under eleven inches.

The 24 W panel and 10,000 mAh battery give a stated 28 hours of running with no light at all - the figure to compare against Betta's stated 30 hours on the SE Plus.

What it does well

• 9 L basket, the only published capacity in this category
• 28 hours of stated runtime without sun
• Stated to park itself at the pool edge after a cycle, so retrieval needs no wading

What it costs you

• The newest brand here, with the least track record
• Physically larger than the Betta units
• No mesh micron rating stated, unlike Betta's 200 um

Skip it if no trees overhang your pool. A 9 L basket is capacity you will never fill, and the Betta SE does the same job for less.

$429.00 - View on Amazon

#ad · how this is funded · price as of October 10, 2026

Where Beatbot fits against the alternatives

• Against a corded Dolphin. Mains power removes runtime from the conversation entirely and costs less - the argument is on Dolphin pool cleaners. Beatbot's answer is no cord in the pool and self-retrieval.
• Against Aiper. Aiper publishes a 3 micron filter on the Scuba V3 and competes directly on price; Beatbot publishes suction and coverage that Aiper mostly does not.
• Against a surface skimmer plus a floor robot. The Sora 70 and the AquaSense range fold both jobs into one machine, which is the real reason for their prices.
• Against the running cost. A battery robot's consumable is its battery, and none of these publish a replacement path - the arithmetic for corded machines is on what a robot costs to run.

What we could not verify

Filtration micron rating for every model, basket capacity for the Sora range, and any figure at all for the AquaSense 2 and AquaSense 2 Ultra beyond their feature descriptions. We have not imported the Sora numbers onto the AquaSense listings, because they are different machines and Beatbot chose not to state them.